--- name: composition-patterns description: Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React component APIs that risk boolean prop proliferation, renderHeader/renderFooter-style slots, prop drilling, trapped local state, context-provider architecture, compound components, explicit variants, or React 19 ref/context composition patterns. --- # Composition Patterns ## Overview Apply scalable React composition patterns from Vercel's `composition-patterns` skill, adapted for this Next.js/FSD repository. Prefer explicit composed APIs over configuration-heavy components, and keep reusable UI parts decoupled from state implementations. ## Workflow 1. Identify whether the component is becoming a mode switcher. Look for multiple boolean props, conditional branches that choose whole UI regions, `renderHeader`/`renderFooter` props, or impossible prop combinations. 2. Split behavior into explicit variants when the rendered structure differs. Prefer names such as `ThreadComposer`, `EditComposer`, or `ForwardComposer` over one `Composer` with `isThread`, `isEditing`, and `isForwarding`. 3. Extract shared pieces into compound components when consumers need to arrange the parts themselves. Use `Root`/`Provider`, `Frame`, `Header`, `Body`, `Footer`, `Trigger`, `Content`, `Action`, or domain-specific names that fit the existing component. 4. Lift shared state into a provider boundary when siblings or custom outer UI need the same state/actions. Keep visual nesting separate from state access: components only need to be inside the provider, not inside the same DOM box. 5. Define a context contract with `state`, `actions`, and `meta` when multiple providers can drive the same UI. UI subcomponents consume the contract, while providers decide whether state comes from local hooks, server-synced data, forms, or feature-specific stores. 6. In this React 19 repo, pass `ref` as a normal prop and use `use(Context)` for context reads where the surrounding codebase allows it. Preserve existing conventions if a nearby component has not migrated yet. ## Decision Rules - Do not add a boolean prop to control a large behavior branch until checking whether an explicit variant or child composition would make the state space clearer. - Use children for static structure composition. Keep render props for cases where the parent must pass item data, measurements, or callback-local state back into the child. - Keep providers as the only layer that knows a concrete state implementation. Subcomponents should not import feature stores or synchronization hooks unless they are provider components. - Avoid prop drilling through compound components. Put shared state/actions in a typed context and expose narrow subcomponents. - Keep FSD boundaries intact: shared compound UI belongs under `src/shared/ui`; feature-specific variants and providers belong in the appropriate feature, entity, widget, or page layer. ## Reference Read `references/rules.md` when you need examples, a review checklist, or the upstream rule inventory. It summarizes all files from: `https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/composition-patterns` at commit `ce3e64e468f8fa09a2d075d102771838061fdac0`.